In this Habeas Corpus petition, the petitioner, wife of the detenu, sought production of her husband. After the detenu expressed willingness to return to his wife, the court permitted them to go together and closed the petition as no further order was necessary.
Performed: Detenu permitted to go with the petitioner; Habeas Corpus petition closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 09.03.2015
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN AND
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE K.B.K.VASUKI
H.C.P.No.637 of 2015
R.Tamilselvi ...Petitioner/ Wife of the detenue
Vs
The Inspector of Police, G.5, Secretariat Colony Police Station, Chennai (Crime No.259/2015) ...Respondent/Complainant
Prayer:- This Habeas Corpus Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to direct the respondents to produce the body andn person of the detenu byname M.Ramesh, aged about 54 years, S/o Muthaiyan, who is the husband of thepetitioner herein before this Court and set him at liaberty and restore him to the custody of the petitioner lkherein.
For Petitioner : Mr.R.Vinu Priyanga
For Respondents : Mr.A.N.Thambidurai, Additional Public Prosecutor for R1 & R2.
ORDER
The petitioner is the wife of the so-called detenu, M.Ramesh. The detenu was produced before this Court by the respondent police. The detenu expressed before this Court the circumstances, under which, he left his wife and expressed his willingness to go back to the wife.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar (CS-II)
True Copy
Sub Assistant Registrar
vsi
To
1. The Inspector of Police,
G.5, Secretariat Colony Police Station,
Chennai
2. The Public Prosecutor,
High Court, Chennai.
H.C.P.No.637 of 2015
SR [CO]
PSI 21.03.2015
2 issues framed by the court
Whether a detenu who expresses willingness to return to his wife should be permitted to go with her under a Habeas Corpus petition.
Whether a further order is necessary to close the Habeas Corpus petition after the detenu's statement.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
R. Tamilselvi
The Inspector of Police
M. Jaichandren
K. B. K. Vasuki
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
