Disposed

A.Veeran v. the Superintendent of Police

Madras HC24 Mar 2015HCP/399/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner filed a habeas corpus petition seeking production and release of his detained adult daughter who was illegally detained by the third respondent. The detenue stated she was willing to return to her father. The court permitted her to go with her father as she was a major and expressed such willingness, closing the petition without further order.

What did the court decide?

Petiton was closed as the detenue, being a major with expressed willingness to leave, was permitted to go with her father.

A.Veeran Vs the Superintendent of Police — Madras HC (2015) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 24.03.2015

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN AND

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE ARUNA JAGADEESAN

¶6

H.C.P.No.399 of 2015

¶7

A.Veeran ..Petitioner
Vs
1.The Superintendent of Police,
Villupuram District.
2.The Inspector of Police,
Thirukovilur Police station,
Thirukovilur,
Villupuram District.
3.Piradhamar ..Respondents
Prayer:- This Habeas Corpus Petition is filed under Article 226 of
the Constitution of India to direct the respondents to produce the
detenue, Vaidegi, D/o A.Veeran, before this Court and set her at
liberty.
For Petitioner : Mr.G.Arul Murugan
For Respondents : Mr.A.N.Thambidurai,
1&2 Additional Public Prosecutor .

¶8

O R D E R

¶9

The matter was not listed today. However, since the Police has secured the alleged detenue, the Registry was directed to put up a special list.

¶10

This Habeas Corpus Petition has been filed by the father of the alleged detenue, Vaidegi, stating that his daughter is illegally detained by the 3^rd respondent, namely, Piradhamar.

¶11

The second respondent police has produced the detenue. Her father is also present. When we enquired the detenue, she had stated that she got married with one Murugan and due to the torture meted out to her, she left the matrimonial home and now, she expressed her willingness to go with her father/ petitioner .

¶12

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶13

Since the detenue is a major and that she has expressed her willingness to go with her father/petitioner, we find it appropriate to permit her to go as per her wish. Hence, the Habeas Corpus Petition is closed, as no further order is necessary.

¶14

Sd/-
Assistant Registrar
True Copy
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
1. The Superintendent of Police,
Villupuram District.
2. The Inspector of Police,
Thirukovilur Police station,
Thirukovilur,
Villupuram District.
3. The Public Prosecutor,
High Court, Chennai.
ksj(co)
krd 15/4
H.C.P.No.399 of 2015

¶15

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

A.Veeran v. the Superintendent of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

A.Veeran v. the Superintendent of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M.P.Ramachandran Vs the Secretary to Government

Banu Vs State of Tamil Nadu

Mohana Vs the Secretary to Government

Jugunu@ Chandrakant Vs State Rep by

R.Settu Vs State of Tamil Nadu

Govindaraj Vs the State of Tamil Nadu