3.According to the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the petitioner is in remand in the ground case in Crime No.316/2014 registered by Tiruppur Civil Supplies CID and the bail application filed by him in the said case before the learned Judicial Magistrate, No.4, Coimbatore in Crl.MP.No.3151/2014 was pending as on the date of the passing of the detention order. Further, the Detaining Authority has stated in the Arrest Memo at page 105 of the Booklet furnished to the detenu, that the arrest in respect of the above case, has been intimated to the mother of the detenu over phone and an endorsement by the authorities has been made to that effect ; but the detaining authority has not furnished any materials to substantiate the fact of serving the Arrest Memo on the mother or wife or any other relatives of the detenu by Thapal or Registered Post. Therefore, it is stated that the detenu was deprived of making an effective representation in the absence of furnishing of full particulars by the Detaining Authority. Hence, it is stated that the Detaining Authority has passed the impugned detention order in total non-application of mind. In support of his contention, the learned counsel for the petitioner relied on the judgment reported in 2008 [3] MLJ [Crl.] 744 [AKILANDESWARI Vs. STATE REP.BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HOME, PROHIBITION AND EXCISE DEPARTMENT, CHENNAI-9 AND ANOTHER].
