A Civil Revision Petition challenging an Order of the District Munsif Court condoning delay in filing documents. The High Court dismissed the petition, holding that there is no legal bar on the plaintiff filing an affidavit supported by her father and upheld the Trial Court's decision.
The Civil Revision Petition and Memorandum of Petition are dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In the High Court of Judicature at Madras
Dated : 22.1.2015
Coram :
The Honourable Mr.Justice V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN
Civil Revision Petition (PD) No.4890 of 2014 and M.P.No.1 of 2014
1.N.Mannar 2.R.Sugumaran 3.B.Kuppan
...Petitioners
Vs
U.Sumathi
...Respondent
PETITION under Article 227 of The Constitution of India against the fair and decretal orders dated 23.9.2014 made in I.A.No.1023 of 2014 in O.S.No. 35 of 2005 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Thiruvetriyur.
For Petitioners : Mr.V.Manisekaran
ORDER
The revision arises out of an order passed by the Trial Court under Order VII Rule 14(3) condoning the delay on the part of the plaintiff in filing additional documents.
on the file of the District Munsif Court, Thiruvetriyur for a decree of permanent injunction. The petitioners herein were the defendants in the suit.
(2)
V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN,J
RS
22.1.2015
Internet : Yes
To
The District Munsif Court, Thiruvetriyur.
CRP(PD)No.4890 of 2014 and M.P.No.1 of 2014
3 issues framed by the court
Whether a Civil Revision Petition under Article 227 is maintainable against an order condoning delay under Order VII Rule 14(3) CPC when the affidavit was filed by the plaintiff's parent.
Whether there is any legal bar on the plaintiff filing an affidavit supported by her father.
Whether the Trial Court erred in condoning the delay in filing documents despite the objection regarding the affidavit.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
N.Mannar
R.Sugumaran
B.Kuppan
U.Sumathi
V.Ramasubramanian
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
