Referred Charge Sheet, whereupon the accused moved a petition for return of documents, which were handed over by them to the Investigating Agency. The petitioner/defacto complainant moved a protest petition. The learned V Additional Sessions Judge, Chennai directed return of documents to the accused in such circumstances. The petitioner also moved an appeal in C.A.No.5 of 2007 against return of documents to the accused. The learned Sessions Judge dismissed the appeal on the reasoning that the documents, which were returned to the accused, had nothing to do with the complaint of the petitioner and it was observed that the petitioner had informed of having filed a civil suit and obtained a favourable decree in respect of the property where regards the petitioner complained of wrong doing by the accused persons. Finding that no interference could be made with the return of documents merely because a protest petition has been moved by the petitioner against the Referred Charge Sheet and further, since the document return of which have been directed to the accused were in no way connected with the transaction informed in the original complaint of the petitioner, the Court below has dismissed the appeal. This Court finds no error in the order of the Court below. This Criminal Revision Petition is dismissed. Consequently,the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS VII) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar To 1. V Additional Sessions Judge Chennai. 2.-Do- The Principal Session Judge, Chennai. 3. The Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Egmore, Chennai 4.-Do- Thro The Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, Chennai Now at Allikulam Commercial Complex, Chennai-3
