Allowed

Andappan @ Tamilselvam v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC30 Apr 2015CRL OP(MD)/6441/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court granted bail to a sole accused charged with murder and other offences, who had been in judicial custody for over 60 days, directing his release on personal bond with sureties and daily police reporting.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail with personal bond of Rs. 10,000 and two sureties for like sum, and directed to appear daily at police station.

Andappan @ Tamilselvam Vs the Inspector of Police — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Madras HC (2015)

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Thirtieth day of April Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT

¶2

The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM

¶3

CRL OP(MD) No.6441 of 2015

¶4

ANDAPPAN @ TAMILSELVAM ... PETITIONER/SOLE ACCUSED

¶5

¶6

STATE REP BY

¶7

THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE VADAKKADU POLICE STATION, PUDUKKOTTAI DISTRICT,

¶8

CRIME NO.29/2015 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT

¶9

For Petitioner : M/S.D.RAMESHKUMAR Advocate

¶10

For Respondent : M/S.A.P.BALASUBRAMANI

¶11

Government Advocate ( Crl. Side)

¶12

PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C.

¶13

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-

¶14

The petitioner is the sole accused in Crime No.29 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police, for the offence punishable under Sections 324, 506(ii) and 302 I.P.C. The petitioner was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 28.02.2015. He has come forward with this petition seeking bail.

¶15

The case of the prosecution is that due to civil dispute, the petitioner had attacked his own brother with spade and caused his death.

¶16

The learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. It is further submitted that the investigation is over and he is in judicial custody for more than 60 days.

¶17

The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) would submit that major part of the investigation is over and the respondent is waiting for chemical analysis report to file charge sheet.

¶18

Considering the facts and circumstances and considering the fact that the petitioner has been in judicial custody from 28.02.2015, this court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

¶19

6.Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Pudukkottai and

¶20

on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.00 a.m. until further orders. sd/30/04/2015 / TRUE COPY /

¶21

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

¶22

¶23

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, PUDUKKOTTAI

¶24

2 -DO-THRO'THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE PUDUKKOTTAI DISTRICT

¶25

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE VADAKKADU POLICE STATION, PUDUKKOTTAI DISTRICT

¶26

4 THE OFFICER-IN-CHARGE, DISTRICT PRISON, PUDUKKOTTAI

¶27

5 THE ADDL.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶28

+1. CC to M/S.D.RAMESHKUMAR Advocate SR.No.24287

¶29

ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.6441 of 2015 Date :30/04/2015

¶30

NA/30/04/2015/P2/7C

¶31

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Andappan @ Tamilselvam v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Andappan @ Tamilselvam v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Moorthy Vs the Inspector of Police

P.Sundaradev Vs the Inspector of Police

A.Kottaisamy Vs the Inspector of Police

R.Mariappan Vs the Inspector of Police

N.Karthi Ganesh Vs the Inspector of Police

K.Subramanian Vs the Sub-Inspector of Police