This is a single paragraph order from the Madras High Court. Upon the Government Advocate submitting that the petitioners' enquiry had been conducted and closed, the Court dismissed the petition for anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. without detailed reasoning.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Monday, the Twenty Seventh day of April Two Thousand Fifteen
PRESENT
THE HON`BLE MR JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM
CRL OP(MD) No.4108 of 2015
1 SUBBU 2 KAVITHA 3 THANGARAJ ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED (RANK NOT KNOWN)
Vs
THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE
DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, TRICHY DISTRICT. CR. NO. NOT KNOWN OF 2015. ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT
For Petitioner : M/S.A.JOEL PAUL ANTONY Advocate
For Respondent : Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)
PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.
ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-
The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) submitted that the petitioner enquiry was conducted and closed.
Recording the same, this petition is dismissed.
sd/27/04/2015 / TRUE COPY /
Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO
+1. CC to M/S.A.JOEL PAUL ANTONY Advocate SR.No. 23038
SR/IV : 29.04.2015 : 1p/4c
ORDER
IN
CRL OP(MD) No.4108 of 2015 Date :27/04/2015
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. should be allowed or dismissed.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Subbu, Kavitha, Thangaraj
The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Trichy District
K. Kalyanasundaram
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
