Allowed

Arasamani v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC20 Nov 2015CRL OP(MD)/21963/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single bench order granting anticipatory bail to petitioners accused under various IPC sections alleging affray and assault. Bail granted on condition of daily police appearance and bond execution with sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners ordered to be released on bail on execution of bond with two sureties each and appearing before respondent police daily at 10.00 a.m.

Arasamani Vs the Inspector of Police — Anticipatory Bail | Madras HC (2015)

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶2

Friday, the Twentieth day of November Two Thousand Fifteen

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

The Hon`ble Ms.Justice V.M.VELUMANI

¶5

CRL OP(MD) No.21963 of 2015

¶6

1 ARASAMANI 2 RANJITHAM @ RANJA ... PETITIONERS/ ACCUSED 1 & 2

¶7

THE STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE NAINAR KOVIL POLICE STATION, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT.

¶8

(CRIME NO.189/2015) ... RESPONDENT/ COMPLAINANT

¶9

For Petitioner : Mr. M.S.JEYAKARTHIK Advocate

¶10

For Respondent : Mr.K.ANBARASAN Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)

¶11

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.

¶12

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-

¶13

The petitioners, who are arrayed as A1 and A2 in Crime No.189 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 294(b), 323, 355 and 506(i) of I.P.C., r/w Section 4 of Women Harassment Act and hence, seek anticipatory bail.

¶14

2.The case of the prosecution is that due to civil dispute between the petitioners and the de-facto complainant, the petitioners attacked the de-facto complainant with deadly weapons and also abused him in filthy language.

¶15

3.The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent and they have been falsely implicated in this case.

¶16

4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) on instruction would submit that the injured has been discharged from the hospital.

¶17

5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions.

¶18

6.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Paramakudi and on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like

¶19

sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.00 a.m., until further orders. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously.

¶20

7.The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

¶21

/ TRUE COPY /

¶22

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.)

¶23

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,

¶24

Madurai - 625 023.

¶25

¶26

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, PARAMAKUDI.

¶27

2 DO THRO THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT.

¶28

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE NAINAR KOVIL POLICE STATION, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT

¶29

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,

¶30

MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶31

+1. CC to Mr.M.S.JEYAKARTHIK Advocate SR.No.66382

¶32

NS/SKS-RR/SAR I/24.11.2015 : 2P/6C

¶33

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Arasamani v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Arasamani v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gopalakrishnan Vs the Inspector of Police

Ayisha Kani Alias Ayisha Beevi Vs the Inspector of Police

K. Murugan Vs State Rep by Sub-Inspector of

Furzana Fathima Vs the Inspector of Police

Kannan Vs the Inspector of Police

Mohammed Asarat Ali Vs the Inspector of Police