Allowed

Malaiyan v. the Sub Inspector of Police

Madras HC28 Oct 2015CRL OP(MD)/20635/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This judgment grants anticipatory bail to petitioners charged with offences under IPC Sections 294(b), 323, 324, 506(ii) and the Tamil Nadu Prohibition for Women Harassment Act due to a wordy quarrel involving cattle tying. The court imposed conditions including executing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, daily appearance by the first petitioner, and appearance of others when required for in

What did the court decide?

Petitioners released on bail in event of arrest or on appeal before Judicial Magistrate; executed bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties; First petitioner to appear daily; others as required.

Malaiyan Vs the Sub Inspector of Police — Cheque Dishonour | Madras HC (2015)

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶2

Wednesday, the Twenty Eighth day of October Two Thousand Fifteen

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM

¶5

CRL OP(MD) No.20635 of 2015

¶6

1 MALAIYAN

¶7

2 NAGAMAYIL

¶8

3 EASWARI ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 2 to 4

¶9

¶10

STATE REP BY THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE PARALACHI POLICE STATION, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT.

¶11

(CRIME NO. 95/15) ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT

¶12

For Petitioner : M/S A.BASKARAN Advocate

¶13

For Respondent : MRS.S.PRABHA Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)

¶14

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.

¶15

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-

¶16

The petitioners, who are arrayed as A2 to A4, apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 294(b), 323, 324 and 506(ii) of I.P.C., r/w Section 4 of Tamil Nadu Prohibition for Women Harassment Act in Crime No.95 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail.

¶17

2.The case of the prosecution is that there was a wordy quarrel arose between the petitioners and the de-facto complainant with regard to tying her cattle in the petitioners' land and due to which, the petitioners along with others assaulted the de-facto complainant and caused injuries.

¶18

3.The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent and they have been falsely implicated in this case.

¶19

4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) would submit that the injured had been discharged from the hospital.

¶20

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions.

¶21

Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Aruppukottai and on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the first petitioner/A2 shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.00 a.m., until further orders and the petitioners No.2 and 3/A3 and A4 shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

¶22

The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

sd/-

28/10/2015

/ TRUE COPY /

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

¶27

¶28

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, ARUPPUKKOTTAI 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,VIRUDHUNAGAR AT SRIVILLIPUTHUR 3 THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE

¶29

PARALACHI POLICE STATION,VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT. 4 THE ADDL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶30

+1. CC to M/S A.BASKARAN Advocate SR.No.63918

¶31

ORDER

¶32

¶33

CRL OP(MD) No.20635 of 2015 Date :28/10/2015 AA/SKS/SAR-I/30.10.2015/2p-6c

¶34

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Malaiyan v. the Sub Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Malaiyan v. the Sub Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S.Sankar Guru Vs the Inspector of Police

Ramalakshmi Vs the Inspector of Police

Rajkumar Vs State Rep the Inspector of

Muthuraj @ Raj Vs the Sub Inspector of Police

Thanga Manoharan Vs the Inspector of Police

Ganesan Vs the Inspector of Police