The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court dismissed a petition for anticipatory bail as withdrawn upon the statement of counsel for the petitioners. No substantive legal reasoning was provided.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn; connected miscellaneous petition closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Wednesday, the Eighth day of April Two Thousand Fifteen
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM
CRL OP(MD) No.20410 of 2014
8 MAHESWARI ..PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 1 to 8
Vs. STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE DINDIGUL CRIME BRANCH, DINDIGUL SUPERINTENDENT OFFICE, DINDIGUL DISTRICT.
CR.NO. 154/2014.
..RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT
For Petitioner : M/S.S.SUNDARA PANDIAN Advocate
For Respondent : Mr.K.V.RAJARAJAN, Government Advocate (Criminal Side)
PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.
ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-
In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, connected MP(MD)No.1/2015 is close.
sd/-
08/04/2015 / TRUE COPY /
Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO
ORDER IN
CRL OP(MD) No.20410 of 2014 Date :08/04/2015
PBK/KBM 13/04/2015 ::1P-3C:
1 provisions across 1 enactments
KARUPPASAMY
PONNAMMAL
SELVARAJ
DHARMARAJ
THIRUPATHI
SABAREESWARAN
K. KALYANASUNDARAM
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
