A petition for anticipatory bail was dismissed on the basis that the respondent has conducted an enquiry and closed it as a mistake of fact.
The criminal original petition for anticipatory bail is dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Monday, the Sixth day of April Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM CRL OP(MD) No.19886 of 2014
A.PANDI ... PETITIONER/SOLE ACCUSED
Vs
STATE REP BY
THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE
ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, TIRUPARANKUNDRAM, MADURAI DISTRICT.
CRIME NO.135/2014 ... RESPONDENT/DEFACTO COMPLAINANT(S)
For Petitioner : M/S.K.SURESH Advocate(NA)
For Respondent : M/S.K.V.RAJARAJAN
Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)
PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.
ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-
Heard both sides.
sd/-
06/04/2015
/ TRUE COPY /
Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
TO
1.THE ADDL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.
2.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE
ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, TIRUPARANKUNDRAM, MADURAI DISTRICT. RL/3 C- 9/4/2015 ORDER
IN
CRL OP(MD) No.19886 of 2014 Date :06/04/2015
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the criminal original petition for anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. should be allowed.
A. Pandi
State (Represented by the Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Tiruparankundram)
K.Kalyanasundaram
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
