Partly allowed

Marisamy v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC17 Feb 2015CRL OP(MD)/16715/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court considered a petition for anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. regarding charges of bigamy and cruelty. Bail was denied to the first petitioner due to serious allegations but granted to the remaining two with conditions to appear for interrogation.

What did the court decide?

Interim anticipatory bail made absolute for petitioners 2 and 3 without fresh sureties; petition dismissed for petitioner 1.

Marisamy Vs the Inspector of Police — Cheating and Forgery | Madras HC (2015)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Seventeenth day of February Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT

¶3

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice P.N.PRAKASH

¶4

CRL OP(MD) No.16715 of 2014

¶5

1 MARISAMY 2 SURIYAKALA 3 POUNRAJ ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED RANKS NOT KNOWN Vs

¶6

STATE.REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, SOOLAKARAI, VIRUDHUNAGAR, CRIME NO.14 OF 2014 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT

¶7

For Petitioner : M/S.R.PON KARTHIKEYAN Advocate

¶8

For Respondent : MR.P.KANNITHEVAN,Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)

¶9

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-

¶10

Apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police in Crime No.14 of 2014, on the file of the respondent police for offences under Sections 498(A), 506 (i) and 494 IPC, the petitioners are now before this Court seeking Anticipatory Bail.

¶11

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Advocate for the respondents.

¶12

Initially, the case was referred to the Mediation and Conciliation Centre and the Mediation Centre has sent a failure report dated 06.02.2015.

¶13

It is the case of the prosecution that the first petitioner got married to the de-facto complainant and they have two children through the wedlock. Subsequently, the first petitioner has married the 2^nd petitioner and has abandoned the de-facto complainant and her two children. Since the allegations against the first petitioner are indeed very serious, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ the first petitioner. As regards the petitioners 2 and 3, since the allegations are not very serious and it is alleged that the first

¶14

¶15

petitioner has married the 2^nd petitioner and the third petitioner is the father of the 2^nd petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners 2 and 3.

¶16

It is submitted that pursuant to the order of interim anticipatory bail granted to these petitioners, the petitioners 2 and 3 have already executed sureties and hence, the anticipatory bail is made absolute in respect of the petitioners 2 and 3. The petitioners need not execute any fresh sureties, as the sureties already executed for the purpose of availing interim anticipatory bail shall hold good. However, the petitioners have to appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. In respect of the first petitioner, this petition is dismissed.

¶17

sd/17/02/2015 / TRUE COPY /

¶18

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

¶19

¶20

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.II,VIRUDHUNAGAR.

¶21

2 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, SOOLAKARAI,VIRUDHUNAGAR.

¶22

3 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶23

+1. CC to M/S.R.PON KARTHIKEYAN Advocate SR.No.7425

¶24

ORDER

¶25

¶26

CRL OP(MD) No.16715 of 2014 Date :17/02/2015 PA/19.02.15/2P/5C

¶27

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Marisamy v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Marisamy v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ganesan Vs the Inspector of Police

Kasinathan Vs the Inspector of Police

S.N.Sabarimalai Vs the Inspector of Police

A.Mariyaselvam Vs the Inspector of Police

Sumathi Vs the Inspector of Police

Naveen Kumar Vs the Inspector of Police