Dismissed

Gopalakrishnan v. the Sub Inspector of Police

Madras HC13 Feb 2015CRL OP(MD)/1393/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court granted bail to the petitioner, an accused in a criminal case, who apprehended arrest under Section 438 Cr.P.C. The court imposed conditions including reporting to police and prohibiting tampering with证据 or absconding.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail upon execution of a bond for Rs.10,000 with two sureties, subject to reporting, non-tampering, and non-absconding conditions.

Gopalakrishnan Vs the Sub Inspector of Police — Anticipatory Bail | Madras HC (2015)

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶2

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Friday, the Thirteenth day of February Two Thousand Fifteen

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr Justice P.N.PRAKASH

¶6

CRL OP(MD) No.1393 of 2015

¶7

GOPALAKRISHNAN

¶8

..PETITIONER/ACCUSED No.3

¶9

Vs.

¶10

STATE REP.BY THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE IDAIYAKOTTAI POLICE STATION, IDAIYAKOTTAI, DINDIGUL DISTRICT.

¶11

CR. NO.100/2014.

¶12

..RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT

¶13

For Petitioner : M/S.S.MANIKANDAN Advocate

¶14

For Respondent : Mr.P.KANNIDEVAN, Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

¶15

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.

¶16

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-

¶17

The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Section 366(A) IPC , in Crime No.100 of 2014 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

¶18

The case of the prosecution is that one Selvakumar is the first accused in Crime No.100 of 2014 and he was in love with one Sathya, who is aged about 17 years and he had eloped with her on 22.11.2014. This petitioner is a friend of A-1. It is represented by the learned Government Advocate [Criminal Side] that the victim girl has been rescued and handed over to her parents.

¶19

In such circumstances, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Ottanchathram, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that:

¶20

[a] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police 06:30 p.m in the evening for a period of two weeks and thereafter as and when required for interrogation.

¶21

[b] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

¶22

[c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

¶23

[d] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

¶24

The Inspector of Police concerned is directed to send compliance report to the office of the learned Additional Public Prosecutor whether the petitioner is complying with the order or not.

sd/-

13/02/2015

/ TRUE COPY /

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.)

¶29

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, OTTANCHATHIRAM, DINDIGUL DISTRICT.

¶30

2 -do-thro'THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, DINDIGUL.

¶31

3 THE ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶32

4 THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, IDAIYAKOTTAI POLICE STATION, IDAIYAKOTTAI, DINDIGUL DISTRICT.

¶33

+1. CC to M/S.S.MANIKANDAN Advocate SR.No.6736

¶34

CRL OP(MD) No.1393 of 2015

¶35

PBK 13/02/2015 ::2P-7C:

¶36

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Gopalakrishnan v. the Sub Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gopalakrishnan v. the Sub Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S.Jegadeesa Marachan Vs the Inspector of Police

R.Muthuvijayaraghavan Vs the Inspector of Police

V. Balasubramanian Vs the Inspector of Police

B. Altaf Vs the Inspector of Police

N. Asaraf Ali Vs the Inspector of Police

P. Panneerselvamq Vs the Inspector of Police