Disposed

S. Krishnakumar v. the Superintendent of Police

Madras HC20 Jul 2015CRL OP(MD)/13500/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench disposed of a Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 CrPC. The court directed the Superintendent of Police to instruct the Inspector of Police to complete the pending enquiry within four weeks and register an F.I.R. if a cognizable offence was made out, per a petition submitted by a citizen on 29.06.2015.

What did the court decide?

Direction to complete enquiry within four weeks and register F.I.R. if cognizable offence made out.

S. Krishnakumar Vs the Superintendent of Police — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2015)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 20.07.2015 CORAM

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH

¶4

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.13500 of 2015

¶5

S.Krishnakumar ...Petitioner

¶6

Vs.

¶7

1.The Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli.

¶8

2.The Inspector of Police, Puliangudi Police Station, Tirunelveli District. ... Respondents

¶9

PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to direct the first respondent to instruct the second respondent to register a case based on the complaint given by the petitioner on 29.06.2015 and investigate the same and file a final report within the period specified by this Honourable Court.

¶10

For Petitioner : Mr.K.N.Senthura Pandian For Respondents : Mr.K.Anbarasan Govt. Advocate (Crl.side)

¶11

ORDER

¶12

This Criminal Original Petition is filed to direct the first respondent to instruct the second respondent to register a case based on the complaint given by the petitioner on 29.06.2015 and investigate the same and file a final report within a stipulated time.

¶13

The learned Government Advocate (Crl. side) on instructions submitted that petition enquiry is pending.

¶14

In view of the same, the second respondent is directed to complete the enquiry within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ order and also directed to register the F.I.R., if cognizable offence is made out, in pursuant to the enquiry conducted.

¶15

¶16

4.With the above directions, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of.

¶17

sd/Assistant Registrar /True Copy/

¶18

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶19

¶20

¶21

1.The Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli.

¶22

2.The Inspector of Police, Puliangudi Police Station, Tirunelveli District.

¶23

The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶24

+1CC to Mr.K.N.Senthur Pandian Advocate SR.No.39410

¶25

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.13500 of 2015 Dated: 20.07.2015

¶26

GJM - 31.07.2015 2P/5C

¶27

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

S. Krishnakumar v. the Superintendent of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S. Krishnakumar v. the Superintendent of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M. Venkatesh Vs D. Indra

Murugan Vs the Inspector of Police

Thropathaiammal, F/65/2015 Vs the Inspector of Police

Saraswathi Vs the Deputy Superintendent of

Anil Alias Beer Mohaideen Vs the Inspector of Police

Ramaiah Vs the Inspector of Police