Allowed

P.Ashok Kumar v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC14 Oct 2015CRL OP(MD)/10214/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order is an application for anticipatory bail where the petitioner faces arrest under Sections 417 and 376 IPC. The court granted bail subject to conditions including attending daily and depositing surety bonds.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail upon arrest with Rs.10,000 bond via two sureties and obligation to appear daily at police station until further orders.

P.Ashok Kumar Vs the Inspector of Police — Narcotics (NDPS) | Madras HC (2015)

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶2

Wednesday, the Fourteenth day of October Two Thousand Fifteen

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM

¶5

CRL OP(MD) No.10214 of 2015

¶6

P.ASHOK KUMAR ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED(SINGLE)

¶7

STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, TALLAKULAM, MADURAI CITY, (CRIME NO. 25 OF 2015) ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT

¶8

For Petitioner : M/S.R.ANAND Advocate

¶9

For Respondent : MRS.S.PRABHA Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)

¶10

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.

¶11

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-

¶12

The petitioner, who is arrayed as an accused, apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent Police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 417 and 376 IPC in Crime No.25 of 2015 on the file of the respondent Police and hence, seeks anticipatory bail.

¶13

2.According to the de facto complainant that the accused by giving false promise of marrying her, had physical relationship with her and thereafter, he refused to marry the de facto complainant.

¶14

3.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the de facto complainant is a 23 years girl and she was already married to one Rajasekaran. It is further stated that the de facto complainant has borrowed money from the petitioner and in order to escape from repaying the amount, a false complaint has been given.

¶15

4.It is further contended that even according to the prosecution, the accused had physical relationship with the de facto complainant with her consent and therefore, the offence of 376 IPC is not made out in this case.

¶16

5.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) appearing for the respondent Police submitted that the de facto complainant is a https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ spinster and she was rapped by the accused by giving false promise on several occasions.

¶17

6.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Madurai, and on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.00 am until further orders. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

¶18

7.The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Court within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

sd/-

14/10/2015

/ TRUE COPY /

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

¶23

¶24

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.II,MADURAI

¶25

2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,MADURAI

¶26

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE

¶27

ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, TALLAKULAM, MADURAI CITY

¶28

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI

¶29

+1. CC to M/S.R.ANAND Advocate SR.No.61129

¶30

ORDER

¶31

¶32

CRL OP(MD) No.10214 of 2015 Date :14/10/2015 AA/AAL-MPA/SAR-II/27.10.2015/2p-6c

¶33

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

P.Ashok Kumar v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

P.Ashok Kumar v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

L. Muthaiah Vs the Inspector of Police

Veraiah Vs the Inspector of Police

Muthaaru Vs the Inspector of Police

A. Abubakkar Vs the Inspector of Police

Raj Vs the Inspector of Police

Senthil Nathan Vs the Insepector of Police