This is a dismissal order where the petitioner filed a petition for anticipatory bail, but sought and was granted permission to withdraw the petition, leading to the dismissal of the case as withdrawn.
Permission granted to withdraw the petition; criminal original petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Monday, the Ninth day of February Two Thousand Fifteen
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr Justice P.N.PRAKASH
CRL OP(MD) No.1003 of 2015
RAMANATHAN ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.1
Vs
STATE REP BY
THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, SIVAGANGAI, CRIME NO.01/2015 ... RESPONDENT/ COMPLAINANT
For Petitioner : M/S.R.SRINIVASAN Advocate For Respondent : M/S.A.P.BALASUBRAMANIAN Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)
PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.
ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-
While this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail, the Learned Counsel for the Petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.
2.In view of the submission and endorsement made by the learned Counsel for the Petitioner, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
sd/-
09/02/2015 / TRUE COPY /
Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
TO
1.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI
2.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE
DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, SIVAGANGAI,
RL/3 C- 12/2/2015 ORDER
IN
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ CRL OP(MD) No.1003 of 2015 Date :09/02/2015
Ramanathan
State Rep by the Inspector of Police District Crime Branch, Sivagangai
P.N. Prakash
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
