In a criminal appeal against an acquittal in a cheque dishonour proceeding, the single judge allowed leave to appeal despite summarily granting it, finding arguable points on law and facts without detailed analysis.
Leave to appeal granted and registry directed to process the appeal memorandum.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
Crl.O.P.No.9698 of 2015 in Crl.A.SR.No.52609 of 2015
P.DEVADASS, J.
Leave to appeal as against the order of acquittal passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate III, Salem in C.C.No.38 of 2014, dated 02.09.2014 is sought for.
3 I have anxiously considered the above submissions of the learned counsel for the appellant and perused the impugned judgment.
4 I find certain eminently arguable points both on law and on facts.
6 Registry is directed to process the appeal
memorandum as per rules.
vaan
21.4.2015
2 issues framed by the court
Whether leave to appeal should be granted against the order of acquittal.
Whether the trial Court erred in acquitting the accused in a cheque dishonour case.
P.DEVADASS
State
P.DEVADASS
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
