Dismissed

K.Bakkiyam v. the State of Tamil Nadu Rep.by

Madras HC14 Dec 2015CRL OP/9096/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., the petitioner sought a direction for police to coordinate with other stations to arrest remaining accused and file a final report. The High Court, noting the arrest of one accused, directed the police to proceed expeditiously with the investigation and apprehend the others, thereby closing the petition.

What did the court decide?

Directed the Inspector of Police, T1-Ambattur, to proceed with investigation, apprehend other accused, and file the final report in Crime No.1626/2012.

K.Bakkiyam Vs the State of Tamil Nadu Rep.by — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2015)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 05.08.2016

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH

¶6

Crl.OP No.9096 of 2015

¶7

K.Bakkiyam .. Petitioner

¶8

¶9

The State of Tamil Nadu Rep.by the Inspector of Police, T1 - Ambattur Police Station, Chennai. .. Respondent

¶10

Prayer:- Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., to direct the respondent police to co-ordinate with Duraiyoor Police Station and Jaihindpuram Police Station and secure the accused for interrogation and complete investigation and file the final report in Crime No.1626/2012 on the file of respondent police.

¶11

ORDER

¶12

This petition has been filed seeking a direction to the

¶13

respondent police to co-ordinate with Duraiyoor Police Station and Jaihindpuram Police Station and secure the accused for interrogation and complete investigation and file the final report in Crime No.1626/2012 on the file of respondent police.

¶14

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent.

¶15

¶16

On 15.07.2015, this Court passed the following order;

¶17

" Today, Mr.Kennedy, Inspector of Police, Uraiyur Police Station, Trichy is present. Mr.Nandakumar, Inspector of Police, T1, Ambattur Police Station, Chennai is also present.

¶18

2. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent, on instructions submits that the police will nab the accused shortly.

¶19

3. In view of the above statement made by the learned Additional public Prosecutor, three weeks time is granted to the police for the arrest of the accused.

¶20

Post the matter after three weeks."

¶21

Today, Mr.K.S.Kandakumar, Inspector of Police, T-1, Ambattur Police Station, is present.

¶22

The learned Additional Public Prosecutor, on instructions, submits that the police have arrested Balasubramaniam (A2) on 21.09.2015, who is the husband of A1, the lady, who had cheated the petitioner. He further submitted that the police have formed a special team and are taking steps to arrest A1.

¶23

¶24

Taking into consideration of the facts and circumstances

¶25

of this case, this Court directs the Inspector of Police, T1 - Ambattur Police Station, Chennai, to proceed with the investigation in Crime No.1626 of 2012 and apprehend the other accused and take action in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible.

¶26

With the above observation, the Criminal Original Petition

is closed

05.08.2016

sms To

The Inspector of Police, T1 - Ambattur Police Station, Chennai.

¶31

2.The Public Prosecutor High Court,Madras.

P.N.PRAKASH,J

sms

Crl.OP No.9096 of 2015

¶36

05.08.2016

K.Bakkiyam v. the State of Tamil Nadu Rep.by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K.Bakkiyam v. the State of Tamil Nadu Rep.by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S.Selvam Vs State by

Nitin .R, S/O Rajkumar Vs the Commissioner of Police

Shanthi Vs the Inspector of Police

T.Sellammal Vs the Home Secretary

Syed Bagat Vs the District Superintendent of

K.R.R.Aiyyappamani Vs State Rep.by