The High Court at Madras allowed a Criminal Original Petition and quashed criminal proceedings in C.C.No.127 of 2011. The decision rests on the admission by the de facto complainant that differences had been settled amicably, rendering no necessity to proceed further.
The Criminal Original Petition was allowed and the proceedings in C.C.No.127 of 2011 were quashed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 02.03.2015
CORAM
The Hon'ble Mr. Justice R.S.Ramanathan
Crl.O.P.No.8155 of 2014
and M.P.Nos.1 and 2 of 2014
P.R.Kavitha ...Petitioner
vs. 1. The State, rep. by Inspector of Police, Karumalaikoodal Police Station, Mettur Taluk, Salem District.
Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code praying to call for records relating to C.C.No.127 of 2011, on the file of Judicial Magistrate No.II, Mettur Dam, Salem District, and to quash insofar as the petitioner is concerned.
For Petitioner : Mr.R.C.Paul Kanagaraj, for Mr.W.M.Abdul Majeed For Respondent-1 : Mr.M.Maharaja Additional Public Prosecutor
For Respondent-2 : Mrs.Sudha, Party-in-Person
This Petition has been filed to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.127 of 2011, on the file of Judicial Magistrate No.II, Mettur Dam, Salem District.
altered into offence under Sections 147, 148, 294(b), 323, 324, 506 (ii) IPC read with Section 109 IPC.
Sd/-
Asst.Registrar (CS III)
/true copy/
Sub Asst. Registrar
sd
To
1. Inspector of Police,
Karumalaikoodal Police Station,
Mettur Taluk, Salem District.
2. The Judicial Magistrate II
Mettur, Salem
2 ccs to Mr.W.M. Abdul Majeed, Sr. 11325
Crl.O.P.No.8155 of 2014
RV (CO) kk 12/3
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the criminal proceedings in C.C.No.127 of 2011 should be quashed following a settlement between the de facto complainant and the petitioner.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
P.R.Kavitha
The State, rep. by Inspector of Police, Karumalaikoodal Police Station
Sudha
R.S.Ramanathan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
