Dismissed

K.Sankarasubramanian v. the Superintendent of Police

Madras HC4 Mar 2015CRL OP/777/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order dismissed a Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking a direction to the police to register a case based on a counter-complaint of cheating. The Court closed the petition after the Additional Public Prosecutor highlighted that the petitioner was already facing criminal proceedings for similar offenses.

What did the court decide?

The petition was closed, leaving the petitioner free to file a private complaint if so advised.

K.Sankarasubramanian Vs the Superintendent of Police — Cheating and Forgery | Madras HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 04.03.2015

¶3

CORAM

¶4

The Hon'ble Mr. Justice R.S.Ramanathan

¶5

Crl.O.P.No. 777 of 2015

¶6

K.Sankarasubramanian ... Petitioner

¶7

vs.
1. The Superintendent of Police,
District Crime Branch,
Kancheepuram District.
2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police,
District Crime Branch,
Kancheepuram District. ... Respondents
Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the
Criminal Procedure Code praying to direct the respondents to register
a case on the basis of the complaint, dated 10.12.2014, pending on
their file and to take action against the persons mentioned therein.

¶8

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Ganesh Babu
For Respondents : Mr.M.Maharaja
Additional Public Prosecutor
O R D E R

¶9

This petition has been filed, seeking direction upon the respondent/Police to register a case on the complaint given by the petitioner, dated 10.12.2014.

¶10

It is submitted by learned Additional Public Prosecutor, representing the respondent/Police that the petitioner is the Managing Director of Akilandeshwari Real Estate Pvt. Ltd.,, and he received monies from various persons and deceived them, and on the basis of the complaint given by one of the investors, by name Balachandran, case was registered against the petitioner in Cr.No.1358 of 2014, on the file of B1 Sivakanchi Police Station,

¶11

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶12

for offence under Section 420 IPC. Similarly, on the complaint given by one other investor, named Ravi, case was registered against the petitioner, in Cr.No.1282 of 2014. Now, the present complaint came to be lodged by the petitioner as a counter-blast to the earlier complaints given by those persons and many more complaints are being received against the petitioner by the deceived persons. The Additional Public Prosecutor, therefore, submitted that there is no authenticity in the allegations made in the complaint given by the petitioner, dated 10.12.2014.

¶13

Recording the above submission, the Criminal Original Petition is closed, and it is open to the petitioner to file private complaint, if so advised.

¶14

Sd/-
Assistant Registrar
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
sd
To
1. The Superintendent of Police,
District Crime Branch,
Kancheepuram District.
2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police,
District Crime Branch,
Kancheepuram District.
3. The Public Prosecutor,
High Court, Madras.
+1cc to Mr.R.Ganesh Babu, Advocate, S.R.No.11976
Crl.O.P.No. 777 of 2015
NM(CO)
CA(16/03/2015)

¶15

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

K.Sankarasubramanian v. the Superintendent of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K.Sankarasubramanian v. the Superintendent of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

G.Kalarani Vs the Inspector of Police

Govindharaj, M/38 Yrs Vs the Director General of

T.S.Narasimha Raju Vs the Inspector of Police

P.Chandran Vs Palaniammal

C.Subathra Banu F/a 30 Yrs Vs State Rep by

Muthukumar Vs State Rep by