P.Karl Marx v. the Director of Vigilence and
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner appeared party-in-person and endorsed withdrawal of the Criminal Original Petition. The petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 10.4.2015
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.DEVADASS
Crl.O.P. No.7096 of 2015
P.Karl Marx .. Petitioner Vs. 1 THE DIRECTOR OF VIGILENCE AND ANTICORRUPTION NO.NCP 21 AND 26 P.S. KUMARASAMY RAJA SALAI RAJA ANNAMALAI PURAM CHENNAI 600 028. 2 D.S.P.VIGILANCE AND ANTI CORRUPTION CHENNAI CITY II DETACHMENT (FAC) CC-IV DETACHMENT NANDANAM CHENNAI 35. 3 THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE VEPERY CHENNAI 600 007. 4 THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE SANTHOME CHENNAI 600 004 .. Respondents
Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to direct the 2nd respondent arrest the accused involved in Cr.No.1/AC/2013/CC-IV, pending on the file of the 2nd respondent, under section 8 and 10 of the Prevention of Corruption Act.
For Petitioner : Mr.P.Karl Marx (party-in-person) For Respondent : Mr.P.Govindarajan Additional Public Prosecutor
O R D E R
The petitioner, who appeared as party-in-person made endorsement withdrawing the petition. Endorsement recorded. Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
kua
4 THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE
SANTHOME CHENNAI 600 004
5 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT, MADRAS
Crl.O.P. No.7096 of 2015
NM(CO)
Eu 23.04.15
1 provisions across 1 enactments
P. Karl Marx
The Director of Vigilenace and Anticorruption
D.S.P. Vigilance and Anti Corruption
The Commissioner of Police Vepery
The Director General of Police
P. Devadass
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court