Mrs.Prema Rajkumar v. the Director General of Police

Madras HC29 Jun 2015CRL OP/7055/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this criminal original petition filed under Section 482 CrPC, the petitioner sought directions to investigate harassment involving money demands. The High Court gave liberty to the petitioner to lodge an in-person complaint with the local police station for necessary inquiry. The petition was subsequently closed as the matter was routed to the appropriate local forum for immediate action.

What did the court decide?

Liberty given to lodge in-person complaint before J-6 Police Station for action; petition closed.

Mrs.Prema Rajkumar Vs the Director General of Police — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 29.06.2015

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH

¶5

Crl.OP No.7055 of 2014

Prema Rajkumar

.. Petitioner

Vs

The Director General of Police, Office of the Director General of Police, Mylapore, Chennai – 600 004.

¶10

The Inspector of Police,

¶11

J-6, Thiruvanmiyur Police Station, Thiruvanmiyur, Chennai-600 041. .. Respondents

¶12

Prayer:- Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., to direct the respondents to take necessary action based on the petitioner complaint dated 12.01.2014 and investigate the same in accordance with law to file final report.

¶13

For Petitioner : Mr.G.Ranganathan For respondents : Mr.C.Emalias,

¶14

Addl.Public Prosecutor

¶15

ORDER

¶16

This petition has been filed to direct the respondents to take necessary action based on the petitioner complaint dated 12.01.2014 and investigate the same in accordance with law to file final report.

¶17

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents.

¶18

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has sent a complaint by post.

¶19

It is seen that the opposite party is unnecessarily harassing the petitioner asking her to give money for buying liquor. If there is any further harassment by the opposite party, the petitioner is given liberty to lodge a complaint inperson before J- 6, Thiruvanmiyur Police Station, Thiruvanmiyur, Chennai-600 041 and on such complaint being given, the same shall be enquired and take action against the accused.

¶20

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶21

In view of the above, the criminal original petition is

¶22

closed.

¶23

sms

¶24

s/d-
Assistant Registrar(J)
True Copy
Sub-Assistant Registrar
To
1. The Director General of Police,
Office of the Director General of Police,
Mylapore, Chennai – 600 004.
2. The Inspector of Police,
J-6, Thiruvanmiyur Police Station,
Thiruvanmiyur, Chennai-600 041.
3. The Public Prosecutor
High Court,Madras.
+ 1 cc to Mr.G.Ranganathan, Advocate SR 32010
gj(co)
prk9/7
Crl.OP No.7055 of 2014

¶25

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Mrs.Prema Rajkumar v. the Director General of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mrs.Prema Rajkumar v. the Director General of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

E.Kesavarthini Vs the State of Tamil Nadu

R.Jayavelu Vs State Rep. by

Tamilarasi Vs the State Rep. by

Thangarasu Vs the Inspector of Police

K.Nagarajan Vs the Inspector of Police

Palaniammal, Vs the Inspector of Police