In a criminal original petition under Section 482 CrPC, the High Court of Madras directed the respondent police to conduct an inquiry based on the allegations in the complaint, following the principles laid down in Lalita Kumari.
Directed the respondent to conduct an enquiry and take further action if a cognizable offence is made out.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 12.03.2015 CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.S.RAMANATHAN Crl.O.P.No.4759 of 2015
Usha Ramachandran ... Petitioner
Vs.
State rep. by its
The Inspector of Police,
S-6, Sankar Nagar Police Station,
Chennai – 75. ... Respondent
Prayer :
Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the
Code of Criminal Procedure, praying to direct the respondent to
register the complaint dated 09.10.2014.
For Petitioner : Mr.J.Milton Arul Rajendiran
For Respondent : Mr.M.Maharaja
Additional Public Prosecutor
ORDER
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor.
2.Considering the allegations made in the complaint, the respondent is directed to conduct enquiry and if any cognizable offence is made out, further action shall be taken following the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court reported in (2014) 2 SCC 1 (Lalita Kumari V. Government of Uttar Pradesh and others).
3.With the above direction, this criminal original petition is disposed of.
To
+1 CC TO MR/J.MILTON ARUL RAJENDRAN ADVOCATE SR NO.13844.
Crl.O.P.No.4759 of 2015
AK[CO]
RD 20/03/2015
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondent police is directed to conduct an enquiry into the allegations made in the complaint.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Lalita Kumari V. Government of Uttar PradeshFollowed¶8
(2014) 2 SCC 1 (Lalita Kumari V. Government of Uttar Pradesh and others) · Who else cites this
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Usha Ramachandran
State
Inspector of Police
R.S. Ramanathan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
