Dismissed

Natarajan v. the Inspector of Police (L&O)

Madras HC19 Feb 2015CRL OP/33121/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought direction to police to include IPC charges in pending investigation. Court held that investigation was pending and final report not filed, so the petition could not be entertained and was dismissed with liberty to approach trial court later. Outcome: Dismissed.

What did the court decide?

The criminal original petition was dismissed because investigation was pending. Liberty granted to approach trial court after final report is filed.

Natarajan Vs the Inspector of Police (L&O) — Quashing and FIR | Madras HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 19.02.2015

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.S.RAMANATHAN

¶5

Crl.O.P.No.33121 of 2013

¶6

Natarajan ... Petitioner

¶7

Vs. The Inspector of Police (L & O) M3 Puzhal Police Station, Chennai 600 066. ... Respondent

¶8

Prayer :

¶9

Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, praying to direct the respondent to include U/s.307, 149, 120(b), 294(b), 323, 324, 326 and 506(ii) of I.P.C. in connected crime No.1935 of 2013 pending on the file of respondent police.

¶10

For Petitioner : No Appearance For Respondent : Mr.M.Maharaja Additional Public Prosecutor ORDER

¶11

No representation for the petitioner. Heard the learned Additional Public Prosecutor.

¶12

2.This application is filed seeking for a direction directing the respondent to include the offences punishable under sections 307, 149, 120(b), 294(b), 323, 324, 326 and 506(ii) of I.P.C. in crime No.1935 of 2013 pending on the file of respondent police.

¶13

3.It is submitted by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor that investigation is pending and after completing investigation depending upon the statement given by the witnesses and the materials collected during investigation final report will be filed by including the relevant sections.

¶14

4.As investigation is pending and final report is not yet filed, the relief sought for in this petition cannot be entertained. Hence, this criminal original petition is dismissed. However, liberty is given to the petitioner to approach the trial court after final

¶15

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶16

report is filed for alteration of charge sheet, if sufficient materials were made available during investigation.

¶17

pri

¶18

-s/d-
Assistant Registrar(Ad-I)
Dt:2/3/2015

¶19

True Copy
Sub-Assistant Registrar
To
1.The The Inspector of Police (L & O)
M3 Puzhal Police Station,
Chennai 600 066.
2.The Public Prosecutor
High Court, Madras.
sr(co)
prk5/3
Crl.O.P.No.33121 of 2013

¶20

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Natarajan v. the Inspector of Police (L&O)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Natarajan v. the Inspector of Police (L&O)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S.Muniappan Vs the Inspector of Police

K.Balakrishnan Vs M.Veera Shanmugamani

S.Thiyagappan, Vs the Senior Intelligence

P.Selvam Vs the Superintendent of Police

Murali, S/O Anjappa Vs the Sub Inspector of Police

D.Karthi, M/a 29 Yrs Vs the Inspector of Police