The High Court of Judicature at Madras dismissed a Criminal Original Petition seeking to quash a criminal complaint under Section 482 CrPC as it was not pressed by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and an endorsement to that effect was present in the bundle.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 24.03.2015
CORAM
The Hon'ble Mr. Justice R.S.RAMANATHAN
Crl.O.P.No.30200 of 2014
and
M.P.Nos.1 and 2 of 2014
1. A.Vivekananthan
2. K.Arumugam
3. Pathmavathy ...Petitioners
vs.
The State, rep. by
Inspector of Police,
All Women Police Station
Udumalpet, Tirupur District. ...Respondent
(Cr. No.12/2013)
Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the
Criminal Procedure Code to call for records in C.C.No.371 of 2013, on
the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.1, Udumalpet, and to quash the
same.
For Petitioners : Mr.V.Vijayakumar
For Respondent : Mr.M.Maharaja
Additional Public Prosecutor
O R D E R The learned counsel appearing for petitioners submits that he is not pressing the Petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect in the bundle.
Sd/Assistant Registrar
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
sd
To
1. Inspector of Police,
All Women Police Station
Udumalpet, Tirupur District.
2. The Judicial Magistrate I,
Udumalpet.
3. The Public Prosecutor,
High Court, Madras.
+1cc to Mr.V.Vijayakumar, Advocate, S.R.No.16260
Crl.O.P.No.30200 of 2014
TM(CO)
CA(27/03/2015)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
A.Vivekananthan
K.Arumugam
Pathmavathy
The State, rep. by Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Udumalpet
R.S.RAMANATHAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
