The Court filed a CrPC Section 482 petition seeking quashing of an FIR. The Government Advocate submitted that investigation completed, charge sheet laid, and case filed in lower court, rendering the petition infructuous.
The petition to quash the FIR is dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 09.02.2015
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE R.MALA
Crl.O.P.No.2978 of 2015
K.Kuppan ... Petitioner/Accused Vs. 1.State rep. by the Inspector of Police Special Investigation Cell Vigilance and Anti Corruption Chennai-600 007. .. 1st Respondent/Complainant 2.R.Mohammed Altaph ... 2nd Respondent/defacto complainant
Prayer:- Petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to call for the records relating to F.I.R.No.11 of 2013 on the file of the first respondent dated 05.11.2013 and to quash the same.
For Petitioner : M/S.S.Ramasamy Law Associates For R1 : Mr.V.Arul Government Advocate (Crl.side) O R D E R
This petition is filed to quash the Crime No.11 of 2013, dated 05.11.2013 on the file of the first respondent.
2.Mr.V.Arul, learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) takes notice on behalf of the first respondent. He submits that on the basis of Crime No.11 of 2013, investigation has been completed and charge sheet was laid and the same was taken as C.C.No.2 of 2015 on the file of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate's Court, Chengalpet and hence, this petition has become infructuous.
3.Heard both sides
4.Considering the submissions made on both sides, this petition is filed to quash the Crime No.11 of 2013, dated 05.11.2013 on the file of the first respondent. Since investigation has already been completed and charge sheet has been laid, which https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ was taken as C.C.No.2 of 2015 on the file of the Chief Judicial
Magistrate's Court, Chengalpet, this petition has become infructuous. Hence, this petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar
Dated:25.2.15
True Copy
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
1.Inspector of Police
Special Investigation Cell
Vigilance and Anti Corruption
Chennai-600 007.
2.The Public Prosecutor
High Court, Chennai.
+1 cc to Public Prosecutor, SR.6761.
rsi(co)
krd 5/3
Crl.O.P.No.2978 of 2015
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a Section 482 Cr.P.C. petition to quash an FIR is maintainable after investigation is completed and a charge sheet is filed.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
K. Kuppan
State
R. Mohammed Altaph
R. Mala
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
