Allowed

G.Thandayutham, v. the Superintendent of Police

Madras HC6 Feb 2015CRL OP/2860/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner filed a petition under Section 482 CrPC seeking a direction for the police to register a case and conduct an enquiry on his complaint dated 14.11.2014, which was not registered. The High Court found it to be a fit case and directed the police to dispose of the complaint report and register a case if a cognizable offence is made out.

What did the court decide?

Directed the second respondent to dispose of C.S.R.No.279 of 2014, conduct an enquiry, and register a case if a cognizable offence is made out.

G.Thandayutham, Vs the Superintendent of Police — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Madras HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 06.02.2015

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE R.MALA

¶5

Crl.O.P.No.2860 of 2015

G.Thandayutham

.. Petitioner

-Vs-

1.The Superintendent of Police,
Office of the Superintendent of Police,
Cuddalore District.
2.The Inspector of Police,
Chidambaram Town Police Station,
Chidambaram,
Cuddalore District. .. Respondents

¶10

PRAYER: Petition is filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure praying to direct the second respondent police to register the cas eon the petitioner's complaint dated 14.11.2014, investigate the same and to file a final report.

¶11

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Sagadevan
For Respondents : Mr.V.Arul
Government Advocate (Crl. Side)
O R D E R

¶12

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondents.

¶13

2.The petitioner has come forward with this petition seeking for direction, directing the second respondent to to register a case on the basis of his complaint dated 14.11.2014.

¶14

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that even though the second respondent has received the complaint on 14.11.2014 and C.S.R.No.279 of 2014 has been given, neither they conducted an enquiry nor registered a case. Hence, he pray for the relief as stated above.

¶15

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶16

4.Resisting the same, the learned Government Advocate (crl. Side) would submit C.S.R. Number has been given and enquiry is going on.

¶17

5.Considering the submissions made on both side and on perusal of the facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the view that it is a fit case to give direction. Accordingly, the second respondent is directed to dispose of C.S.R.No.279 of 2014 and to conduct an enquiry and register a case, if cognizable offence is made out, as expeditiously as possible.

¶18

6.With the above direction, the Criminal Original Petition is disposed of.

¶19

Sd /-
Assistant Registrar
//True Copy//
Sub-Assistant Registrar
cse
To
1.The Superintendent of Police,
Office of the Superintendent of Police,
Cuddalore District.
2.The Inspector of Police,
Chidambaram Town Police Station,
Chidambaram,
Cuddalore District.
3.The Public Prosecutor
High Court, Madras.
+ 1 C.C. TO MR.R.Sugadevan Advocate Sr.6515/15
Crl.O.P.No.2860 of 2015
KK[CO]
KS 23/02/2015

¶20

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

G.Thandayutham, v. the Superintendent of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

G.Thandayutham, v. the Superintendent of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S.Eswaramoorthy Vs v.S.Krishnamoorthy

S.Shiram Vs State Rep.by the Inspector of

S.Vairamani Vs the Inspector

Xavier Kanthinathan, Vs State Rep. by

Y.Akbar Ahmed, Vs the Inspector of Police

Shri.Balaji Stampings Vs the Inspector of Police