The High Court dismissed a Criminal Original Petition seeking quashing of an FIR by recording that the petition had been withdrawn by the learned counsel for the petitioners.
Crl.O.P. dismissed as withdrawn; connected Miscellaneous Petitions closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 23.07.2015
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH
Crl.O.P.No.26157 of 2014
M.P.Nos.1 of 2014 and 1 of 2015
1. Mr.H.Ramesh
2. Mrs.Urvashi ...Petitioners/Accused 1&2
Vs
1. The Inspector of Police,
EDF-1, Team-1, Central Crime Branch,
Chennai.
(Crime No.250 of 2013)
2. Mr.N.K.Shashi Kumar ...Respondents/Complainant
defacto Complainant
Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C.,
seeking to quash the FIR registered in Cr.No.250 of 2013, on the
file of the respondent-Police.
For Petitioners : Mr.D.Saikumaran
For 1 st Respondent : Mr.C.Emalias,
Addl. Public Prosecutor
For 2 nd Respondent : Mr.B.Kumar, Senior Counsel
for Mrs.K.Sumarthi
O R D E R
When this Court was about to dismiss this case, on merits,
learned counsel for the petitioners sought permission to withdraw
this petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.
Recording the same, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No
costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are also
closed.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
skm
To
The Inspector of Police, EDF-1, Team-1, Central Crime Branch, Chennai.
+1cc to Ms.K.Sumathi, Advocate, S.R.No.37591 +1cc to Mr.d.Saikumaran, Advocate, S.R.No.38010
TEJ(CO)
EU(31/07/2015)
Crl.O.P.No.26157 of 2014
Mr. H. Ramesh
Mrs. Urvashi
The Inspector of Police, EDF-1, Team-1, Central Crime Branch,
Mr. N.K. Shashi Kumar
P.N. Prakash
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
