Dismissed

R. Amudavanan v. State by Inspector of Police

Madras HC27 Jul 2015CRL OP/18789/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of a Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 CrPC seeking fair investigation and addition of offences. The Court held FIRs cannot be amended under CrPC but may reflect grave defects in the final report, and closed the petition.

What did the court decide?

The petition was closed without granting any specific relief regarding the investigation or final report.

R. Amudavanan Vs State by Inspector of Police — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Madras HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED 27.07.2015

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH

¶5

Crl.OP.No.18789 of 2015

¶6

R.Amudhavanan ... Petitioner

¶7

¶8

State rep.by The Inspector of Police, F-4, Thousand Lights Police Station (L & O), Chennai-600 006. ... Respondent

¶9

Prayer:- Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to make a fair and impartial investigation in Crime No.1027 of 2015 on the file of the respondent and to add the correct penal provisions in synchronize with the gravity of the overt act inflicted by the perpetrators of the crime and also to file a final report in accordance with law.

¶10

For Petitioner :Mr.J.Nagarajan For Respondent :Mr.C.Emalias Additional Public Prosecutor

¶11

ORDER

¶12

This petition has been filed to make a fair and impartial investigation in Crime No.1027 of 2015 on the file of the respondent and to add the correct penal provisions in synchronize with the gravity of the overt act inflicted by the perpetrators of the crime and also to file a final report in accordance with law.

¶13

2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondent and perused the materials placed on record.

¶14

3.On a complaint lodged by the petitioner, the respondent police have registered a case in Crime No.1027 of 2015 on 05.06.2015 for offences under Sections 341 and 323 IPC. Now, it is the case of the defacto complainant that other offences are to be added in the FIR. The FIR cannot be amended under the Code of Criminal Procedure and during the investigation, if grave offences surfaces, it is needless to say that the police will include those offences also in the final report.

¶15

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶16

With the above observation, this Criminal Original Petition is closed.

¶17

mps

¶18

s/d-
Assistant Registrar(J)
True Copy
Sub-Assistant Registrar
To
1.The Inspector of Police,
F-4, Thousand Lights Police Station (L & O),
Chennai-600 006.
2.The Public Prosecutor,
High Court, Chennai.
+ 1 cc to Mr.J.Nagarajan, Advocate SR 38548
lrs(co)
prk11/8
Crl.OP.No.18789 of 2015

¶19

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

R. Amudavanan v. State by Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

R. Amudavanan v. State by Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

N.Shamsunissa Vs the Superintendent of Police

N.Muruganandam Vs the State Rep. by Its

S.Kannan Vs the State of Tamilnadu

Kgs Developers Ltd., Vs Rakesh P.Sheth

Nachimuthu, 75/25, Vs Inspector of Police, Dcb

Anil Kumar Vs the Sub Inspector of Police