Allowed

V.Bhuvaneshwaran M/a 32 Yrs v. State Rep by

Madras HC13 Feb 2015CRL OP/1229/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court disposed of a Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 CrPC. Relying on Lalita Kumari, the Court directed the respondent Inspector of Police to register an FIR based on the petitioner's complaint dated 07.07.2014 and investigate the matter in accordance with law.

What did the court decide?

Directed the respondent to register the case on the basis of the petitioner's complaint dated 07.07.2014 and investigate the same in accordance with law.

V.Bhuvaneshwaran M/a 32 Yrs Vs State Rep by — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Madras HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 13.02.2015

¶3

CORAM

¶4

The Hon'ble Mr. Justice R.S.Ramanathan

¶5

Crl.O.P.No.1229 of 2015

¶6

V.Bhuvaneshwaran ...Petitioner/Complaint

¶7

vs.

¶8

State rep by

¶9

The Inspector of Police (Crime), H-5, New Washermenpet Police Station,

¶10

New Washermenpet,

¶11

Chennai-600 081.

¶12

...Respondent/Respondent

¶13

Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code praying to direct the respondent police to register an FIR on the basis of the petitioner's complaint dated 07.07.2014, investigate the matter and file a final report within a stipulated period of time.

¶14

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Sasikumar

¶15

For Respondent : Mr.M.Maharaja

¶16

Additional Public Prosecutor

¶17

O R D E R

¶18

This petition has been filed, seeking a direction to the respondent police to register an FIR on the basis of the petitioner's complaint dated 07.07.2014, investigate the matter and file a final report within a stipulated period of time.

¶19

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor representing the respondent-Police.

¶20

Considering the allegations made in the complaint and in view of the dictum laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in re Lalita Kumari vs. Govt. of U.P. & others reported in [2013 (4) Crimes 243 (SC)] which has to be followed in letter and spirit viz., that if a cognizable offence is made out, the respondent-Police is duty bound

¶21

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶22

to register a case, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of, by directing the respondent to register the case on the basis of the petitioner's complaint dated 07.07.2014 and investigate the same in accordance with law.

¶23

Sd/-
Asst. Registrar
/true copy/
Sub Asst. Registrar.
To
1.The Inspector of Police (Crime),
H-5, New Washermenpet Police Station,
New Washermenpet,Chennai-600 081.
2. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.
+1cc to Mr.R.Sasi kumar ,Advocate SR.No.8238
Crl.O.P.No.1229 of 2015
RJ(co)
EU 24.2.15

¶24

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

V.Bhuvaneshwaran M/a 32 Yrs v. State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

V.Bhuvaneshwaran M/a 32 Yrs v. State Rep by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Annadurai Vs State Rep by

G.Latha Vs the Commissioner of Police

V.Nadhiya (26 Years) Vs the State of Tamilnadu

Miss.D.Foulina Vs the Superintendent of Police

Selvakumar Vs the Inspector of Police

M/S.Proteck Machinery Pvt. Ltd. Vs the Superintendent of Police