Disposed

N.Pandurangan v. State by

Madras HC4 Jun 2015CRL OP/11193/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner filed an Original Criminal Petition under Section 482 CrPC praying for a direction to register a case on his complaint. The Court directed the police to conduct an enquiry expeditiously and register a case if a cognizable offence is made out, relying on Lalita Kumari.

What did the court decide?

Direction to conduct enquiry expeditiously and register a case if a cognizable offence is made out.

N.Pandurangan Vs State by — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED 04.06.2015

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH

¶5

Crl.OP.No.11193 of 2015

¶6

N.Pandurangan ... Petitioner Vs State by The Inspector of Police, T-1, Ambattur Police Station, Ambattur, Tiruvallur District, Chennai-58. ... Respondent

¶7

Prayer:- Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to direct the respondent to register the case on the petitioner's complaint dated 17.04.2015 and investigate the same and submit a report to the Court.

¶8

For Petitioner :Mr.S.Sadasharam For Respondent :Mr.C.Emalias Additional Public Prosecutor ORDER

¶9

Seeking a direction to the respondent to register the case on the petitioner's complaint dated 17.04.2015 and investigate the same and submit a report to the Court, the petitioner has come up with this petition.

¶10

2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondent and perused the material placed on record.

¶11

3.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that based on the complaint lodged by the petitioner, the petition enquiry is pending in CSR.No.286 of 2015 before the respondent.

¶12

4.Recording the submission of the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, the respondent police is directed to conduct enquiry expeditiously and during the course of enquiry, if any cognizable offence is made out, a regular case shall be registered, following the decision laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Lalita Kumari v. Government of Uttarpradesh and Others reported in (2014) 2 SCC 1.

¶13

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶14

With the above direction, this Criminal Original Petition is closed.

¶15

-s/d-
Assistant Registrar(CS-II)
True Copy
Sub-Assistant Registrar
mps
To
1.The Inspector of Police,
T-1, Ambattur Police Station,
Ambattur,
Tiruvallur District,
Chennai-58.
2.The Public Prosecutor,
High Court, Madras.
+ 1 cc to Mr.S.Sadasharam, Advocate SR 26825
rv(co)
prk9/6
Crl.OP.No.11193 of 2015

¶16

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

N.Pandurangan v. State by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

N.Pandurangan v. State by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S.Selvaraj Vs Inspector of Police

Ranjith @ Ranjith Kumar Vs the State Rep. by

K.P.Mani Vs the Superintendent of Police

K.Mani Vs R.Kanthamma

Vinay Jain Vs the Inspector

Sathiyaraj, 35 Years Vs the Inspector of Police