The High Court dismissed a criminal appeal quashing proceedings under the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court held that the appeal must be dismissed as the respondent/accused had passed away. No substantive merits regarding the appeal were considered.
Criminal Appeal dismissed as the respondent/accused had passed away.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATE : 01-10-2015
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. SELVAM
Criminal Appeal No.481 of 2007
N. Gandhi ... Appellant/complanant Vs. Kumarapillai ... Respondent /Accused
Criminal Appeal under Section 378, Cr.P.C., against the judgment of acquittal dated 24-03-2007 by the Principal District Munsif, Ambur, Vellore District in C.C.No.80 of 2006.
For appellant :: Mr. A.R. Sindhu for Mr.r.John sathyan For respondent ::Mr. P. Govindarajan, Additional Public Prosecutor
JUDGMENT The present appeal has been filed against the order of acquittal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
Sd/(CS-VII) Assistant Registrar True Copy Sub Assistant Registrar To The Principal District Munsif, Ambur, Vellore District Criminal Appeal No.481 of 2007 ppa[co] srg 5/11/2015
2 provisions across 2 enactments
N. Gandhi
Kumarapillai
A. Selvam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
