In Crl.A.No.143 of 2002, the Madras High Court, after observing that neither counsel appeared for the appellant nor the respondent, dismissed the criminal appeal filed under Section 378 Cr.P.C. for default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 06.10.2015
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.SELVAM
Crl.A.No.143 of 2002
M/s.Upasana Finance Ltd.,
rep. by its Assistant Manager
S.Krishnan .. Appellant
Vs.
C.Krishnan .. Respondent
Prayer:- Criminal Appeal filed under Section 378 of Cr.P.C.
against the order of acquittal dated 06.12.2001 passed by the
learned XXIII Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet, Chennai in
C.C.No.4116 of 1998.
For Appellant : No appearance
For Respondent : No appearance
JUDGMENT
Neither counsel is present. Even on earlier hearing,
nobody has made appearance. Under the said circumstances, this
criminal appeal is dismissed for default.
Sd/-
Asst.Registrar (CS IV )
/true copy/
Sub Asst. Registrar
msk
To
The XXIII Metropolitan Magistrate,
Saidapet, Chennai.
+1 cc to Mr.P.M.Jayachandran, Advocate, sr.54148
Crl.A.No.143 of 2002
ala co, kra 12/10 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
M/s. Upasana Finance Ltd., rep. by its Assistant Manager S. Krishnan
C. Krishnan
A. Selvam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
