N.Rajkumar v. P.Narayanan
Case brief
What is this about?
This contempt petition challenged the respondent's alleged disobedience of an order dated 04.02.2015. The respondent assured compliance within a week. The court closed the petition, directing the respondent to pass orders on the representation and remain open to seek police/revenue assistance if needed.
What did the court decide?
Directed respondent to dispose of the representation within one week.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED:19.06.2015
Coram
The Hon'ble Mr. Justice T.S. SIVAGNANAM
Contempt Petition No.721 of 2015
N.Rajkumar ... Petitioner Vs. Mr.P.Narayanan ... Respondent
Petition filed Section 11 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for having committed contempt of Court for disobeying the order dated 04.02.2015, made in W.P.No.2693 of 2015. For Petitioner : Ms.S.P.Mullai For Respondent : Mr.K.Rajakumar O R D E R
Heard Ms.S.P.Mullai, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.K.Rajakumar, learned counsel appearing for the respondent.
- The learned counsel appearing for the respondent
submitted that he has filed vakalat for the respondent. Mr.P.Narayanan Commissioner, Palladam Municipality, is also present. The learned counsel for the respondent submitted
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the respondent committed contempt by failing to act on the order dated 04.02.2015 in W.P.No.2693 of 2015.
Whether the petitioner's representation regarding disconnection of illegal pipelines was disposed of effectively.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
N. Rajkumar
- respondent
Mr. P. Narayanan
Coram
T.S. Sivagnanam
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court