S.Imayavaramban v. T.Rengaraj
Case brief
What is this about?
In Contempt Petition No.558 of 2015, the alleged contempt petitioner was absent for both morning and afternoon sessions. Since the court seized of the related Writ Appeal, the Contempt Petition was closed with the petitioner to file remedies subsequently.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED:11.06.2015
Coram
The Hon'ble Mr. Justice T.S. SIVAGNANAM
Contempt Petition No.558 of 2015
S.Imayavaramban ... Petitioner
Vs.
1.T.Rengaraj
The Managing Director,
State Express Transport Corp.,
(Tamilnadu)
Thiruvalluvar Illam,
Pallavan Salai, Chennai – 600 002.
2.Thiru.M.L.Kandavel, (Secretary Incharge), The Secretary of the Corporation and Information Officer, State Transport Corpn., Ltd., No.2., Pallavan Salai, Chennai – 600 002. ... Respondents
Petition filed Section 11 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for having committed contempt of Court for disobeying the order dated 27.02.2014, made in W.P.No.7356 of 2011. For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondents : Mr.P.Paramasivadoss
O R D E R When the matter was called for forenoon, there was no
representation on behalf of the petitioner and therefore, it was passed over. During the post-lunch session once again the matter was called, there was no representation for the petitioner.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
S.Imayavaramban
- respondent
T.Rengaraj
- respondent
Thiru.M.L.Kandavel
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court