M/S.K.Madhavachar & Sons v. Mrs.Gayathiri
Case brief
What is this about?
Common order in contempt petitions directed the Railways Administration to reconsider merits of petitioner's representations and pass a reasoned decision within two weeks before closing the petitions.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
In the High Court of Judicature at Madras
Dated: 17.04.2015
Coram:
The Honourable Mr. Justice T.S.SIVAGNANAM
Contempt Petition Nos. 487 and 490 of 2015
M/s. K. Madhavachar & Sons
rep. by its Managing Director K. Subramanian No.28, Elumalai Street West Tambaram, Chennai-45.
.. Petitioner in both petitions vs.
- Mrs. Gayathiri The Senior Divisional Commercial Manager, Chennai Division Annex Building, Southern Railway Chennai 600 003.
- Mr. Vinoth Sharma
The Regional Director Indian Railway Catering and Tourism Corporation Ltd. Zonal Office, No.6-A, Rain Tree Place No.9, Mc. Nicols Road
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
M/s. K. Madhavachar & Sons
- respondent
Mrs. Gayathiri
- respondent
Mr. Vinoth Sharma
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court