Arulmighu Omsakthi Muthalmman v. Murali Sundaram
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner filed a Contempt Petition against the Police Inspector for non-compliance of a previous Court order. The Court found no willful disobedience due to a delay, especially as a criminal case was registered on the petitioner's complaint. Petition closed without punishment. (1268 CNM 597)
What did the court decide?
No punishment imposed; petition closed.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 05.11.2015
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.T.SELVAM
CONT.P.No.3328 of 2014
Arulmighu Omsakthi Muthalamman Thirukkoil,
represented by its Secretary,
G.Elumalai …. Petitioner
vs
Murali Sundaram
Inspector of Police (Law & Order),
S-13, Chrompet Police Station,
Chrompet, Chennai – 600 044. .... Respondent
Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act to punish the respondent under the Contempt of Courts for violating the Court order made in Crl.O.P.No.3617 of 2014 dated 27.02.2014.
For Petitioner : Mr.M.Chidambaram
For Respondent : Mr.C.Iyyapparaj
Government Advocate (Crl.Side)
*******
O R D E R
This petition is filed against the non-compliance of the order of this Court passed in Crl.O.P.No.3617 of 2014 dated 27.02.2014.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondent's delay in complying with the Court's order in Crl.O.P.No.3617 of 2014 constitutes willful disobedience warranting punishment.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Arulmighu Omsakthi Muthalamman Thirukkoil
- respondent
Murali Sundaram
Coram
C.T.Selvam
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court