Ajax Thambu v. G.Settu
Case brief
What is this about?
The court considered a contempt petition filed for disobedience of a prior order. It held that since the final report was filed, no further order was warranted, and liberty was granted to approach the appropriate forum. The petition was closed.
What did the court decide?
Petitioner granted liberty to approach appropriate forum for remedy in the manner known to law; Contempt Petition closed.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Date:- 17.04.2015
Coram
The Honourable MS. JUSTICE K.B.K.VASUKI
Contempt Petition No.2835 of 2014
Ajax Thambu ... Petitioner
..vs..
G.Settu
Sub-Inspector of Police
Katpadi Police Station
Vellore. ... Respondent
The Contempt Petition is filed under Section 11 of the
Contempt of Courts Act, 70/71, to punish the Respondent for
his deliberate and contumacious disobedience to the orders
of this Court dated 25.07.2014 made in Crl.O.P.No.20200 of
2013.
For Petitioner : Mr.Harshad P.Goklaney
For Respondent : Mr.D.Shivaramkumar
Government Advocate (Crl. Side)
O R D E R
Both the learned counsel on record are present.
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2. In view of the submission made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) that the final report is
2
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether liberty needs to be granted to the petitioner to approach appropriate forum since the final report was filed.
Whether the Contempt Petition should be closed.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Ajax Thambu
- respondent
G.Settu
Coram
MS. JUSTICE K.B.K.VASUKI
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court