K.Krishnan v. M.Naga Pooshani
Case brief
What is this about?
Contempt petition for non-implementation of a prior order was closed on the respondent undertaking compliance via appointment of a fit person within the relevant department.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED :: 14-12-2015
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.SATHYANARAYANAN
CONTEMPT PETITION No.2657 OF 2015
K.Krishnan
... Petitioner
-vs-
Mrs.M.Naga Pooshani, Assistant Commissioner,
Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department, Thiruvallur District. ...
... Respondent
Petition under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the respondent for wilful disobedience and not implementing the orders with letter and spirit, made in W.P.No.18408 of 2014, dated 25.06.2015.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
K. Krishnan
- respondent
Mrs. M. Naga Pooshani
Coram
M. Sathyanaranayan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court