Rajat Gupta v. Radhakrishnan
Case brief
What is this about?
The court closed the Contempt Petition for wilful disobedience. It directed the concerned court to dispose of the petitioner's protest petition expeditiously within three months.
What did the court decide?
Closed the Contempt Petition and directed disposal of protest petition within three months.
What the court decided
1
In the High Court of Judicature at Madras
Dated : 15.04.2015
Coram :
The Honourable MS.Justice K.B.K.VASUKI
CONTEMPT PETITION No.250 OF 2015
Rajat Gupta .. Petitioner
Vs
Radhakrishnan
Inspector of Police,
B-2, Esplanade Police Station,
Chennai-104. .. Respondent
PETITION under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act
1971 to punish the respondents under Section 11 of the
Contempt of Courts Act for wilful disobedience of the order
dated 25.09.2014 passed in Crl.O.P.No.27065 of 2014.
For Petitioner : Mr.R.Rajiv Gandhi
For Respondent : Mr.V.Arul
Government Advocate (Crl.Side)
O R D E R
Both the learned counsel on record are present and are heard.
- It is now submitted by the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) that the FIR was registered and the investigation was also completed and RCS is already filed before the Court concerned after giving notice to the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ petitioner and protest petition is also filed by the petitioner, hence, no further order is necessary in this
2
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the Contempt Petition for wilful disobedience should be dismissed or closed pending the outcome of the protest petition
Whether directions for expeditious disposal of the protest petition are necessary
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Rajat Gupta
- respondent
Radhakrishnan
Coram
K.B.K. Vasuki
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court