E.Muniyan v. Karuppasamy
Case brief
What is this about?
Respondents submitted that the order in W.P.No.28810/2014 dated 25.11.2014 has been complied with. Recording this statement, the High Court closed the contempt petition without further adjudication.
What did the court decide?
The contempt petition was closed after recording the respondent's statement of compliance.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 25.03.2015
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH
Contempt Petition No.222 of 2015
E.Muniyan ..Petitioner
Vs.
1. Mr.Karuppasamy,
The Joint Director of
School Education (Personnel),
D.P.I.Compound, College Road,
Nungambakkam,
Chennai - 600 006
2. Mr.R.Swaminathan,
The Additional Chief Educational Officer
(Sarva Sikshya Abhiyan), (SSA)(,
Villupuram,
Villupuram District. .. Respondents
Prayer : Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of
the Contempt of Courts Act to punish the respondents for
wilfully and wantonly disobeying the order of this Court
dated 25.11.2014 in W.P.No.28810 of 2014.
For Petitioner : No Appearance For Respondents : Mr.P.Rajalakshmi, Govt.Advocate
O R D E R
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ It is submitted by the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents that the order dated
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
E. Muniyan
- respondent
Mr. Karuppasamy
- respondent
Mr. R. Swaminathan
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court