The High Court of Madras disposed of a contempt petition initiated for disobedience of orders in WP.No.1749 of 2011, declining adjudication as the respondent had accepted the petitioner's claim in a subsequent order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 23.02.2015
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.SASIDHARAN
Cont.P.No.2084 of 2014
K.Balasubramanian .. Petitioner Vs Pradip V.Philip, I.P.S., Additional Director General of Police (E.O.W) Anna Nagar, Chennai 40 .. Respondent Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act to initiate the contempt of court proceedings to punish the respondent herein for his willful/deliberate disobedience in not implementing the orders dated 11.10.2012 in full and complete in W.P.No.1749 of 2011.
For Petitioner :Mr.A.L.Namasivayam
For Respondent :Mr.I.Arockiasamy, Government Advocate
O R D E R
The respondent passed an order dated 25.08.2014 accepting
the claim made by the petitioner in part and rejecting his https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
request for movement to Selection Grade in the post of Sub
2
Inspector of Police. In view of the order dated 25.08.2014, nothing survives for adjudication in the Contempt Petition.
SD/ DEPUTY REGISTRAR(CLAA) //Certified to be true copy// Dated at Madras this the day of 2015. COURT OFFICER(O.S.) From 25th Day of September 2008 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the Orders/Judgments/Decrees in this format. SM/CO/23/04/2015 One CC to Government Pleader, SR.2624 One CC to Mr.A.L.Namasivayam, Advocate, SR.2630 To Thiru Pradip V.Philip, I.P.S., Additional Director General of Police (E.O.W) Anna Nagar, Chennai 40
K.Balasubramanian
Pradip V.Philip
K.K.Sasidharan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
