R.Jayadevan v. K.Shanmugam IAS
Case brief
What is this about?
In a contempt petition filed under Section 11 read with proviso to Section 2(b) of the Contempt of Courts Act, the High Court closed the petition after the respondents rejected the petitioner's request via proceedings dated 3.7.2015, granting liberty to work out remedy.
What did the court decide?
Liberty to the petitioner to work out his remedy in the manner known to law.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 09.12.2015 CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH Contempt Petition No.1272 of 2015
The Graduate Physical Education Teachers Association, No.5/13, Anandan Street, Chidambaram - 608 001, Cuddalore District, rep.by its State President, R.Jayadevan ... Petitioner Vs.
- Thiru.K.Shanmugam, I.A.S., The State of Tamil Nadu, Principal Secretary to Government, Finance Department, Secretariat, Fort St.George, Chennai - 600 009,
- Tmt.Sabitha, I.A.S., The State of Tamil Nadu, Principal Secretary to Government, School Education Department, Secretariat, Fort St.George, Chennai - 600 009,
- Thiru.Kannappan,
The Director of School Education,
DPI Campus, College Road, Chennai - 600 006. ... Respondents
Prayer: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of Contempt of Courts Act praying to punish the respondents for having violated the order passed in W.P.No.28826 of 2014 dated 5.11.2014.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
The Graduate Physical Education Teachers Association, rep.by its State President, R.Jayadevan
- respondent
Thiru.K.Shanmugam, I.A.S.
- respondent
Tmt.Sabitha, I.A.S.
- respondent
Thiru.Kannappan, The Director of School Education
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court