This is a brief order dismissing a commercial appeal under Section 35-G of the Central Excise Act due to the non-prosecution of both parties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATE : 12.02.2015
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR AND
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.KARUPPIAH
C.M.A. NO. 67 OF 2010
The Commissioner of Central Excise Coimbatore.
...Appellant/Respondent
Appeal filed under Section 35-G of the Central Excise Act against the order dated 4.6.09 passed by the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, South Zonal Bench, Chennai, made in Final Order No.668/2009.
For Appellant : No Appearance
For Respondents : No Appearance
JUDGMENT
(DELIVERED BY R.SUDHAKAR, J.)
When the matter was called, neither the appellant nor its counsel is present. This clearly shows that the appellant is not interested in pursuing the matter. Learned counsel for the respondent is also not present. Therefore, this appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(J)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
GLN
To
1 CC to Mr.K.Rajasekar, Advocate SR.No. 8142
C.M.A. NO.67 OF 2010
AD (CO) PSI (02.03.2015)
The Commissioner of Central Excise Coimbatore
The Chief Accounts Officer (TR-1) O/o PGMT, BSNL
The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal South Zonal Bench
R. Sudhakar
R. Karuppiah
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
