Partly allowed

National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. R.Santhi

Madras HC7 Jul 2015CMA/299/2011

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Division Bench allowed the insurance company's appeal to reopen the quantum of compensation in a motor accident death case, finding the Tribunal's calculation of loss of income too high due to incorrect multiplier and under-deduction of personal expenses for a bachelor, ultimately confirming the same award amount. It also upheld the Insurance Company's liability to deposit the amount.

What did the court decide?

Appeal allowed by recalculating loss of income, but the final award of Rs.10,00,000/- with interest is confirmed and insurer directed to deposit the same.

National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs R.Santhi — Motor Accident Claims | Madras HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED:7.7.2015

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.KIRUBAKARAN

¶5

CMA.No.299 of 2011

¶6

National Insurance Company Limited, No.751 Mount Road, 3^rd Floor Chennai-600 002. ... Appellant/2nd Respondent -Versus1.R.Santhi 2.M.S.Rajendran ... Petitioners 1 & 2 3.U.Lalitha ... Respondents/1st Respondent

¶7

The civil Miscellaneous appeal is filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act 1988 against the Judgement and decree dated 20.10.2009 and made in M.A.C.T.O.P.No.3223 of 2005 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Chennai (In the II Court of Small Causes Court), Chennai.

¶8

For Appellant : Mr.S.Vadivel
For Respondent : Ms.A.Soloni
for Mr.B.Naveen Raja
J U D G E M E N T

¶9

The appeal has been preferred by the Insurance Company against the award of Rs.10,30,735/- for the death of one S.R.Balaji, 21 year old, third year student of hotel management and also working as part time Supervisor, allegedly earning about a sum of Rs.16,000/- in the accident occurred on 21.9.2004.

¶10

Heard Mr.S.Vadivel, learned counsel appearing for the appellant and Ms.A.Soloni, learned counsel appearing for the respondents/claimants. The only question to be decided is with regard to quantum of compensation.

¶11

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶12

The Tribunal took Rs.7500/- as monthly income as it was alleged that the claimant was working part time job as Catering Supervisor with a Private Catering Contractor. Taking into consideration, the deceased was above average student and also considering his future prospects, after deducting 1/3 towards personal expenses and applying multiplier-13, as per age of the mother determined the loss of income at Rs.7,80,000/-, including other amounts, Rs.10,30,735/- was awarded and rounded to Rs.10,00,000/-.

¶13

Though the claimant is an employee as per Ex.P12, Income Certificate stating that the deceased was working as a part time Catering Supervisor with a Private Catering Contractor, the Tribunal did not believe that document. However, it determined the monthly income at Rs.7,500/- per month. In any event, the said determination cannot be termed to be on the higher side.

¶14

As the deceased would have earned after completion of the course, the income of Rs.7500/- per month, determined by the Tribunal is confirmed. The Tribunal, only deducted 1/3 towards personal expenses. Whereas, the deceased was a bachelor and therefore, 50% is required to be deducted towards personal expenses. The Tribunal ought to have adopted the multiplier as per the age of the deceased. Whereas, the Tribunal applied multiplier as per the age of the mother. Therefore, according to the age of the deceased namely, 21 years, appropriate multiplier is 18 and the same is adopted. Thus the loss of income is calculated as Rs.7,500/- - Rs.50% X 12 X 18 = Rs.8,10,000/-.

¶15

Rs.70,995.22/- awarded towards medical expenses as per Ex.P2, Income Certificate is confirmed. Similarly Rs.1,27,740/- paid as medical expenses, Rs.2000/- towards funeral expenses awarded are also confirmed. Rs.50000/- awarded towards loss of love and affection is reduced to Rs.20,000/-. The award of Rs.10,30,735/- rounded to Rs.10,00,000/- is confirmed.

¶16

The Tribunal taking into consideration of no driving licence was possessed by the driver of the van insured with the appellant Insurance Company, rightly exonerated the Insurance Company. However, the Tribunal directed the Insurance Company to pay and recover the amount from the owner of the van. The said consideration is as per law and the same cannot be interfered with. The award of the Tribunal Rs.10,00,000/- along with interest at 9.5% per annum is confirmed. The appellant is directed to deposit the entire award amount along with interest and costs after deducting the amount if any already deposited within a period of four weeks from the date of the receipt

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶18

of a copy of the order. On such deposit, the respondents are permitted to withdraw the entire award amount as per the ratio fixed by the Tribunal within one week thereafter. The appeal is dismissed. No costs. Consequently the connected M.P.No.1 of 2015 is closed.

¶19

Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS IV)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
vk
To
The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal,
Chennai (In the II Court of Small Causes Court),
Chennai.
Copy To
The Section Officer,
V.R.Section,
High Court, Madras.
+1cc to Mr.B.Naveen Raja, Advocate, S.R.No.33882
+1cc to Mr.S.Vadivel, Advocate, S.R.No.34104
C.M.A.No.299 of 2011
JSV(CO)
CA(23/07/2015)

¶20

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. R.Santhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. R.Santhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The Managing Director Vs R. Shanmugam

Mr.M.P.Rao, Vs Mr.N.R.Das

K. Shivakumar Vs Dr. Kamalavalli Shivakumar

The Managing Director Vs Anandaselvi

The Managing Director Vs Easwari

The Managing Director Vs R/ Ramakrishnan