In a partition suit and subsequent civil miscellaneous appeal, parties submitted a joint compromise memo stating the matter was settled out of court. The High Court dismissed the original suit and disposed of the appeal based on the settlement.
O.S. No. 91 of 2010 is dismissed as settled; the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. KIRUBAKARAN
(R4 to R11 impleaded as party respondents vide order of Court dated 12.03.2015 made in M.P. No. 1 of 2015 in C.M.A. No. 2930 of 2013) ..Respondents
Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal as against the judgment and decree dated 02.07.2012 passed in A.S. No. 27 of 2012 on the file of Principal District Court, Salem, setting aside the judgment and decree dated 28.06.2011 passed in I.A. No. 444 of 2010 in O.S. No. 91 of 2010 on the file of Sub Court, Sankagiri.
This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal has been preferred by defendants 3 & 4 in O.S. No. 91 of 2010 aggrieved over allowing of the appeal in A.S. No. 27 of 2012 by judgment and decree dated
02.07.2012, which was filed by the plaintiffs in O.S. No. 91 of 2010, challenging the order of rejection of plaint dated 28.06.2011 passed in I.A. No. 444 of 2010 in the above said original suit.
nv
To
C.M.A. No. 2930 of 2013
JSV(CO)
Eu 22.07.15
Santhakumar
Shanmuga Vadivu
Saravana Balaji
Akila Madeswari
Ponnusamy
Chinnadurai
N. Kirubakaran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
