The M.D v. v.Dhanalakshmi
Case brief
What is this about?
Appeal by TNSTC against Motor Accident Claims Tribunal award dismissing appeal as order was within limits and multiplier was correctly fixed; time granted for deposit.
What did the court decide?
Appellant granted four weeks to deposit compensation amount; failing which additional interest at 6% p.a. will apply.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED 06.11.2015
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAJA
C.M.A. NO.2450 OF 2015
& M.P.NO.1 OF 2015
The Managing Director, TNSTC, Villupuram. .. Appellant/Respondent Versus
1.V.Dhanalakshmi 2.Minor Nitish Kumar Sharma Minors 2 & 3 (Rep. by their friend & Mother 1st Respondent) 3.Minor Devadarshini 4.Eswari 5.Ranganathan .. Respondents/Petitioners
PRAYER : Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 [Act IV of 1939], against the judgment and decree passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Salem, Salem District [Additional District & Sessions Court for EC Act Cases, Salem] in M.C.O.P.No.1402 of 2011, dated 04.12.2012.
For Appellant : Mr.P.Paramasiva Doss
J U D G M E N T
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Tribunal erred in fixing the notional income of the deceased at Rs.5,000/- in the absence of income proof.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
The Managing Director, TNSTC, Villupuram
- respondent
V.Dhanalakshmi and Others
Coram
T.Raja
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court