Partly allowed

Gomathi v. Amsavalli

Madras HC23 Jul 2015CMA/1486/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This appeal challenged the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal's award of Rs. 3,80,000 for the death of an 8-year-old minor. The High Court held that no deduction for personal expenses should be made as the deceased was a minor. It enhanced the compensation to Rs. 5,00,000, following the Supreme Court in Kishan Gopal, and directed the insurance company to deposit the enhanced amount.

What did the court decide?

Compensation enhanced from Rs. 3,80,000 to Rs. 5,00,000 with interest at 7.5% per annum directed to be deposited by the insurance company within six weeks.

Gomathi Vs Amsavalli — Motor Accident Claims | Madras HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 23.07.2015

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.KIRUBAKARAN

¶5

C.M.A.No.1486 of 2015

¶6

Gomathi 2. Padmanabhan ... Appellants/Petitioners vs. 1.Amsavalli 2.United India Insurance Co. 134 Greams Road, Chennai – 2. ... Respondents / Respondents Civil Miscellaneous Appeal has been filed under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act against the award and decree passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, (Chief Judge, Small Causes Court), Chennai dated 22.12.2014 and made in MCOP No.4725 of 2013. For Appellant : Mr.S.Udhyakumar For Respondents : Mr.D.Baskaran for R2 JUDGMENT

¶7

The appeal has been preferred by the parents of the deceased against the award of Rs.3,80,000/- awarded by the tribunal as compensation for the death of their son Pawan, aged about 8 years who died in the accident occurred on 19.04.2013.

¶8

Heard Mr.S.Udhayakumar, learned counsel appearing for the appellants/claimants and Mr.D.Baskaran, learned counsel appearing for the second respondent/insurance company.

¶9

The tribunal, taking into consideration notional annual income of the deceased at Rs.30,000/- and deducting 1/3^rd towards personal expenses and applying multiplier 15, determined the loss of income at Rs.3,00,000/-. Towards loss of loss of love & affection a sum of Rs.25,000/- each is awarded to the appellants. Rs.25,000/and Rs.5,000/- was awarded towards funeral expenses and transport expenses, respectively totalling to a sum of Rs.3,80,000/- as compensation. In a similar circumstances, the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Kishan Gopal & another vs. Lala & others reported in 2013 (2) TN MAC 358 (SC), took Rs.30,000/- as the annual notional income and

¶10

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶11

adopting multiplier applicable to the age of the mother of the deceased, awarded a sum of Rs.4,50,000/- towards loss of dependency. Towards non-conventional damages, Rs.50,000/- was awarded. In the above said judgment, 1/3^rd was not deducted towards personal expenses, taking into consideration the fact that the deceased was a minor at the time of accident.

¶12

Even though it is stated that the deceased was aged 5 years old, Ex.P7-Post mortem certificate reveals that the minor was aged about 7 years old. Without deducting 1/3^rd towards personal expenses, this court, following the judgment cited supra in Kishal Gopal & another, awards a sum of Rs.4,50,000/- towards loss of dependency and Rs.50,000/- under non-pecuniary heads totalling Rs.5,00,000/- as compensation to the appellants/claimants. The rate of interest awarded by the tribunal @ 7.5% per annum shall remain unaltered.

¶13

In the result, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is partly allowed enhancing the compensation from Rs.3,80,000/- to Rs.5,00,000/- alongwith interest @ 7.5% per annum from the date of petition till the date of deposit. No costs.

¶14

The 2^nd respondent/insurance company is directed to deposit the entire amount awarded by this court, alongwith interest and costs, less the amount already deposited, if any, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. On such deposit, the appellants/claimants are permitted to withdraw their respetive shares on the basis of ratio fixed by the tribunal, less the amount already withdrawn, if any.

¶15

rgr s/dAssistant Registrar(CO) True Copy Sub-Assistant Registrar To The Chief Judge, (Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal) Small Causes Court, Chennai.

¶16

1 cc to Mr.S.Udayakumar, Advocate SR 37510 + 1 cc to Mr.D.Bhaskaran, Advocate SR 37450 gr(co) prk15/9 C.M.A.No.1486 of 2015

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Gomathi v. Amsavalli

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gomathi v. Amsavalli

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bajaj Allianz General Vs L. Amali

The Managing Director Vs Pachaiyammal@Pachammal

Thirumalvalavan@Kambadasan Vs Elaiyaraja

L.Juliet Ann D Cruz Vs X.Aloysius Xavier Lopez

Unite Dindia Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs Sridharan S/O.Sammandham Thanj

M.Babu Vs M/S. Ruchi Health Foods