Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

R. Pushpa baby Vs — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2015)

Home
Madras HC
2015
R. Pushpa baby VsR. Pushpa baby Vs

Dismissed

R. Pushpa baby Vs

Madras HC16 Sept 2015A/6094/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court dismissed Application No. 6094 of 2017 as withdrawn upon counsel's request for permission to withdraw the application.

What the court decided

AI extract

A

Application No. 6094 of 2017

DR.ANITA SUMANTH,J.

Learned counsel appearing
for the applicant seeks permission
to withdraw this application and
makes an endorsement to this
effect. Accordingly, this
application is dismissed as
withdrawn.
03.11.2017
msv

http://www.judis.nic.in

Coram

AI extract

DR. ANITA SUMANTH

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Madras HC
Decided on: 16 Sept 2015 · September
Registered: 8 Sept 2015
Case no.: A/6094/2015

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from Master

Mrs.Umrao Kanwar Vs Mr. S. Jaganath
26 Aug 2015
M/s. Capital Infomine Vs Tmt. Ali Rahamathulla
19 Aug 2015
Mr. Dharma Durai Durai Vs M/s. Kotak Mahendra Bank
19 Aug 2015
Vs
16 Sept 2015
Jameela Begum and Another Vs L.Salauddin and 10 Others

Cite this judgement

R. Pushpa baby Vs, A/6094/2015 (MAD), decided on 16 September 2015.

The Madras High Court publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Bench / Coram

DR. ANITA SUMANTH

Parties & counsel

Outcome

Dismissed

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

The application was dismissed as withdrawn on 03.11.2017 at the instance of learned counsel seeking permission to withdraw the same. No substantive legal issues were addressed.

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

CNR

HCMA010376212015

Topic

Writ and Judicial Review

Bench

Disposal

DELAY CONDONED

28 Oct 2015

K.Shanthi Vs Jayalakshmi

11 Jan 2016