The Madras High Court held that a writ petition filed by a non-selected candidate seeking appointment as a Graduate Teacher, filed three years after the result publication, is not maintainable due to delay and laches, and dismissed the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED:07.03.2014
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAVICHANDRABAABU
W.P.(MD)No.4051 of 2014 & M.P(MD)No.1 of 2014
K.Ashalatha : Petitioner
Vs.
The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Teacher Recruitment Board, D.P.I. Complex, College Road, Chennai-600 006. ...Respondent
PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issue of a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondent to appoint the petitioner as Graduate Teacher by including her name in the selection list within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.
For Petitioner : Mrs.J.Anandhavalli For Respondents : Mr.S.Kumar Addl. Govt.Pleader.
ORDER
The prayer in this writ petition is for Mandamus to direct the respondent herein to appoint the petitioner as Graduate Teacher by including her name in the selection list.
2
Gsr
Sd/Assistant Registrar[P&A] /True copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar
TO
The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Teacher Recruitment Board, D.P.I. Complex, College Road, Chennai-600 006.
+1cc to M/s..J.Anandhavalli, Advocate SR.No.14343. +1 cc to Special Government Pleader, SR.No.14898.
W.P(MD)No.4051 of 2014 dated:07.03.2014
2P/4C RPB 24.03.2014
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ petition seeking appointment as a Graduate Teacher filed three years after the non-selection order is maintainable on grounds of delay and laches.
K.Ashalatha
The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Teacher Recruitment Board
K.Ravuchandrababu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
